Monday, January 3, 2022

Gunhee Lee , Period 1, 12/22/21

 Gunhee Lee , Period 1, 12/22/21


Gunhee Lee

Period 1 

December 22, 2021

Modern Mythology 2022


Literacy & Learning: 

Write about your thoughts regarding any of the fiction or nonfiction covered in class.

Recently, we looked at some stories from the Bible. One of these stories was the Book of Job. This book tackled the question, Why do bad things happen to good people? Job was a righteous man, and yet, he went through great suffering. He lost all his possessions and children. His wife left him, and at the height of his misery, his friends came and lectured him on his sinfulness. Despite knowing he hadn’t done anything wrong, his friends were convinced that he was covering up great sin, and that his suffering was just, divine punishment. Much of the discussion in our class regarding this story was pointing out how Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar and Elihu were horrible friends for kicking the man while he was down. However, I believe that there can be some justification for Job’s friends, especially Elihu. The passage tells us that upon seeing Job, his friends sat in silence with him for 7 days and 7 nights. Until they opened their mouths, his friends had done everything right. They were there for him in his time of greatest suffering, and their words, however cruel they may have seemed, were what they thought Job needed to hear. The common thought process was that you would reap what you sow. If you do good, you will receive good. If you sin, then you will suffer. Seeing Job’s suffering, they believed he had sinned, and told him to repent so that God’s anger would burn against Job no longer. If he had done something wrong, this would have been exactly what he needed to hear. 

Additionally, at the end of the book, when God speaks to them, he tells Job to offer a burnt offering in order to intercede on behalf of Bildad, Zophar, and Eliphaz. Elihu was left out here, and I believe it is because his words were not wrong in their substance. Whereas the other 3 told Job that he was suffering as a result of his own wickedness, Elihu emphasized God’s power and justice. Elihu upholds God's greatness. 

In essence, Job held firmly to his belief that he was righteous, whereas his 3 friends were trying their best to get him to understand that he couldn’t have been righteous if he was suffering like this. The view of the friends is something we can look at and condemn, but at the same time, we often hold the same view. How often is it that when we are going through our own trials that we ask the question: “What did I do wrong?” It’s only natural for us to think that we would get what we deserve, and it’s because of this that I believe that Job’s friends are misunderstood, rather than truly wishing to do Job harm.


Reflect on any new information you have learned in English class by considering how that learning influences your critical perception

As a devout Christian, my personal view going into this passage was that this was a piece of nonfiction. However, for the purposes of this class, I had to go in looking from a lens that viewed the Book of Job as a piece of fiction. As I did this, I noticed a lot more than I had before. I was able to see each archetype that Job and his friends represented. I was able to see the format of the book was set up like a play. I was able to acknowledge some of the theories that rather than being the events in the life of an actual man that lived, this book was instead, a hypothetical situation that was made up to teach morals about suffering, and the mystery that is God. I was able to see the importance of having multiple views, rather than a single one.


How is what you’re learning applied to any other classes/the world around you?

I’m currently the president of the Christian Seekers Club at my school. Thus, my job is to prepare a devotional based on a Bible passage every week. I usually read through the passages a few times, examining it under the lens of the Christian worldview, and provide an analysis of the text, and applications of the text for the club members. However, I think that following these lessons in class, I was able to look at each Bible passage from multiple lenses rather than the single one. I think that I was able to improve the quality of the devotionals, and through doing this, make the meetings seem more appealing to non-christians, as they would be able to relate a little more to what I was saying.

George Jejelava, Period 7, 12/17/21

 

Literacy and Learning:


    During our most recent unit on the bible, my group was tasked with giving a short presentation to the class on the story of Moses. While researching the story, I came to an interesting realization: the story of Moses has nothing to do with Moses himself. Rather, the story uses Moses as an extension of God himself. The true conflict of the story deals with the Pharaoh who refuses to acknowledge God’s will.


    When Moses entered the Pharaoh’s hall and told the Pharaoh that a plague of blood will come if he does not release the Jewish people, the Pharaoh laughed him off. When the first plague comes, Moses returns to the Pharaoh with proof that it is God’s will that the Jewish people be released. Moses warns the Pharaoh that yet another plague will come if the Pharaoh fails to act. The Pharaoh. once again, laughs Moses off and pays the price for it. This process is repeated another 8 times before the Pharaoh, at long last, acknowledges that he is condemning his people to the wrath of God. He finally follows God’s will and releases the Jewish people from their bondage in Egypt.


    When we think about the story from the Pharaoh’s perspective, a particular detail comes to rise. The Pharaoh was not punished for enslaving the Jewish people, nor was he punished for all of the crimes he committed against them. The Pharaoh was solely punished because of his refusal to follow God’s will. This detail poses an interesting question that I will leave the readers of this blog with: can morality ever exist outside of a religious context? Is God’s will truly supreme? Or can we be just through our own introspection?

Sunday, January 2, 2022

Jason Lu, Period 7, 1/3/2022

 Goal Setting & Growth

At this current point in time, what specific goal(s) do you have for yourself? Why?

We as human individuals have a unique attraction to the concept of fulfillment, and thus we, as a general statement, recognize such fulfillment as a life goal. A part of what makes our lives unique, however, is the distinctness of how we achieve this fulfillment, as each individual sees the world in a different way.
What defines fulfillment to me is not fame or remembrance. For me, I’ve set a goal to make a lasting impact on the world, like making key contributions to important social movements, and helping environmental protection and research. If I can make people smile, and bring happiness into the lives of the oppressed, I believe my goal can be answered. If I can help ensure that future generations can still experience the calming, or on the inverse, exciting effect of nature, I will be satisfied.
On a more local scale, my relationships with close people give me the underlying meaning I need to even attempt any activism. I have made it an objective of mine to solidify my relationships with friends and family, especially as I move on into college and we move separate ways.

How do you demonstrate resilience towards achieving this goal? (or these goals?)

A common obstacle that causes many people to avoid this goal is the difficulty for an individual to make meaningful difference. Due to the design of our society, the average working-class citizen lacks the voice and funding to make even miniscule social/policy changes. Even within large international organizations, progress towards their goals are slow, often because of the lack of public support.
But even despite these blockades, I and many others still find it absolutely necessary that we push forward. If we have even the slightest chance at changing something, even if it does involve hard work, we could save countless people and future generations from the confines of inequality. Though I understand the reason why many are apathetic, I believe we have an obligation as social creatures to share our fortune and strength with those that have less. 

How does the world around you affect your perception of this goal? (or these goals?)

The world around me IS what gives these goals meaning for me. What sticks with me as I walk through Manhattan or look through social media isn’t the glamorous lifestyle of the rich, but rather the help that the working-class needs so desperately. The political unrest in our nation just screams social imbalance, and to me, I feel it is necessary for me to at least allocate one goal towards the progression of social reforms.
The vastness of the world and the scale of our ever growing population often results in concerns over the meaning of oneself. At the position in society that I am at, as a student,  though I can plan for and contribute to activism (which I am already), the contribution is more minimal than I would deem satisfactory for my goals. A display of mutual dependence for those close to me comes naturally, but I find it important to maintain and strengthen these as a necessity to maintain some pride in me on this eerily large planet. 


Brian Lum, Period 7, 1/4/2022

 Brian Lum 

Period 7 

January 4, 2022 

Modern Mythology 2022 

Literacy and Learning 

To me, one of the most fascinating topics our class explored in the past couple of months was the apocalypse. Human culture contains vast interpretations of how the world will end and, typically accompanying that, how the world will eventually be “reborn”. For example, the Christian interpretation of the apocalypse depicts the world being engulfed in all sorts of calamities in an elaborate scheme: a mountain falling into the sea would turn a third of its water into blood, supernatural horses exhaling fumes of fire, smoke, and sulfur would roam the earth, and stars would fall to the ground, all perpetrated by God to cleanse the earth of wicked sinners. After the apocalypse finished, however, a gleaming kingdom would come down from heaven, where only pure humans would be allowed to live. 

Norse mythology depicts an apocalypse both like and unlike the Bible in several ways. First, the main players - in this case, the Norse gods - have not done anything wrong; unlike the people depicted in the Bible, Norse mythology does not invoke the gods’ wickedness as a reason for why the apocalypse happens. Yet like the Bible, the apocalypse has been extensively planned out regardless, with the gods of Asgard fighting against the forces of Loki and supernatural monsters. In contrast to the Bible, the gods fight back against the forces that aim to destroy the world: Thor and the others engage in numerous battles against monsters such as Fenrir and Surtr while humans in the Bible are helpless in the calamities’ wake. However, like the Bible, the

world is reborn once more following the chaos: the green earth arises from the gray waters, a daughter sun emerges in place of its mother, and mankind eventually re-populates the earth. Having fears about the uncertainties of life and what comes after is no more alien to us than it was to humans hundreds of years ago. Clearly, Christians and Vikings would have felt much safer knowing exactly what would happen to their civilizations than continuing to have no idea, and even safer believing there would be a happy ending after the apocalypse had concluded. Those stories of rebirth serve to encourage humans that there is a point of living and contributing to their societies. After all, if there was no belief system that promoted a happy ending or if no one knew what would happen, people from those cultures who questioned their existence and the earth’s would have felt hopeless. All in all, apocalypse stories have taught me that my life will barely affect the outcome of the apocalypse and, if it eventually does happen, the end of the world is in the distant future. Therefore, I should instead keep on doing what I always have been and plan to do: giving meaning to my own life myself and living it out in a way that makes me happy.


Ray Lian, Period 7, 1/3/22

 Ray Lian

1/3/22

Period 7

Gods, Monsters, and the Apocalypse


What are your thoughts and feelings about issues of inequity, oppression, and/or power?

Oppression, inequity, and power are all connected together. Inequity happens because of oppression which in turn is caused by those with power. I believe that everyone should have the right to live a comfortable life. People shouldn’t have to worry about getting harassed, arrested, fired from their job, or even killed because of their gender, race, skin color, or sexual orientation. Yet they do have to worry because these ideas, racism, sexism, etc, are deeply rooted into the government. People harboring hate towards a group of people because they want to maintain power and stay elite is absurd and preposterous to me. People with power grow hungry for more, and become arrogant. They lose their sense of rationality because they want to prevent themselves from losing that power. Every time I see injustice and corruption, it baffles me that people have the audacity to do such things. Even though everything might seem gloomy, I believe that it will get better. With the world changing at such a rapid pace, an increasing number of people are uniting to combat these prejudices and problems. It’s only a matter of time now.


How do you reflect critically on your own beliefs, assumptions, values, and experiences, and how these can influence your perception of self and others?

There are many times where I would just sit alone and think of everything that has happened in my life till now, all the experiences I associate with happiness and all those that associate with stress or sadness. But most of the time, I remember the stressful events much more vividly. I always go back to them and think about how I could have done things and approached them differently. These memories linger with a sting of bitterness if I see myself able to repeat these mistakes. I constantly try to be better than who I was yesterday. The questions I constantly ask myself are “did I do it correctly” and “am I satisfied with what I did.” If the answer to either question is no, I take a step back to reflect on those actions. 

My beliefs and values are very straightforward, in the sense that people should be treated with respect and kindness, whether or not I like them. I always see myself becoming foolish when I start becoming disrespectful because someone is being rude or obnoxious and this goes for how I see other people as well. A lot of my decisions are made with rationality and judgement so when I see people acting recklessly and unreasonably, it gives me a bad impression of them. Though I try my best to at the very least, to respect them even if my ideas disagree with theirs. Some of my introspection has taught me to become more aware of what I am doing and how that can affect the people and environment around me. 


Ryan McDermott, Period 8, 1/3/2022

 Ryan McDermott,Period 8,1/3/2022


Write about your thoughts regarding any of the fiction or non-fiction covered in class.


In class I was  able to learn about the way the ancient Egyptians thought about death and how they made guides for the afterlife. From the documentary I was able to learn that ancient Egyptians thought of life as the preparation for the eternal paradise that was death. They believed that the book of the dead was a guide to a prosperous afterlife. The Egyptians sold the book of the dead for large sums of money meaning only the wealthy had access to it. I was able to learn how archeologists had great efforts to preserve the Egyptian artifacts. Budge was able to get parts of the book of the dead from robbers before they were seized by the Egyptian government. However, some of the artifacts were destroyed in the blackmarket. This saddens me because parts of the history of Egypt was destroyed by looters and thieves just trying to make money. Additionally,  I learnt about the apocalypse in both Christian and Norse mythology. These stories have caused me to think deeper about life and death and have given me additional perspectives to think about.

Reflect on any new information you have learned in English class by considering how that learning influences your critical perception.

Learning about the book of the dead influenced how I perceive different cultures' viewpoints of life and death. I am able to compare and contrast the Egyptians views with the Norse and Greeks views. For example the Egyptians viewed life as a preparation for death where they would find eternal paradise. This contrasts with the Norse view of life. The Norse believed that you needed to live life to the fullest. However, both cultures shared the common idea that people should not be scared of death because an eternal paradise awaits them in the afterlife. This also bears similarities to another culture we learned about, Christianity, and their belief in the afterlife.

How is what you’re learning applied to any other classes/the world around you?

What I’m learning about in class has allowed me to think about my own perceptions of life, death and the possibility of an apocalypse. The beliefs of these cultures regarding life and death can be applied to the way I live my own life. The Norse belief of being unafraid and wanting to live life to the fullest is very meaningful to me. This is due to the fact that I need to work harder and take every opportunity given to me to improve my life and achieve my goals. Additionally, the book of the dead documentary shows the importance of preserving ancient culture as well as learning new perspectives on life and death.


Saturday, January 1, 2022

Selina Zheng, Period 1, 1/20/22

Selina Zheng, Period 1, 1/20/22

Modern Mythology 2022

Literacy and Learning 

  • Custom prompt accepted by Mrs. Fusaro 


The Paradox of No Longer Human


No Longer Human by Osamu Dazai is a compilation of paradoxical philosophical thought. An unreliable narrator agonized by his isolation from society creates the effect of a peine forte et dure (literally being crushed to death). Dazai’s writing is imbued with inescapable darkness, his thoughts heavy, his mood melancholic - and yet, far from being an oppressive read, it is enlightening. 


Although the book’s introduction and conclusion is presumably Dazai writing as himself, the bulk of the novel is three fictionalized diaries. Thus, No Longer Human’s real protagonist is Oba Yozo - not that it makes much difference, since Yozo is Dazai’s author surrogate. The first person narration immerses us in Yozo’s psyche, regardless of whether or not we have experienced what he has. 


This tendency towards deeply personal writing, whether in his fiction or memoirs, was likely influenced by the shishōsetsu (a portmanteau of the Japanese characters for ‘I’ and ‘novel’) movement. “I-novels” became popularized in conjunction with the concept that an author’s bibliography could directly represent the author’s empirical self. It is for this reason that No Longer Human is considered a ‘barely fictionalized autobiography’, as well as because many scenes are pulled directly from Dazai’s own life. 


Although it’s mostly referred to as No Longer Human in the Western world, the book is actually called Ningen Shikkaku (人間失格). A more literal translation would be “Disqualified from Being Human.” While both translations have their purposes, I prefer Disqualified from Being Human, because at least to me, it has a greater emotional impact. Yozo is not becoming no longer human, he is disqualified - that is, he doesn't fit the requirements of a human being. It encapsulates the oppressive mood of the novel, the overpowering fear that underneath flesh and blood, something else lurks. The insinuation that there are certain traits that must be fulfilled to be classified as human, and that without them, Yozo is not, creates a drowning sense of helplessness. Yozo’s fear that he is only an empty shell has greater emphasis in the latter. 


Additionally, it has adds another layer of nuance to Yozo’s character. As aforementioned, Yozo was born human, it is an innate characteristic. Therefore, it should be impossible for him to not be human. Over the course of the novel, his agonies, originally directed inwards, begin to manifest themselves externally. In order for a tragedy to be deemed as such, the protagonist must face the consequences of his own actions. Like Oedipus Rex, their undoing must be by their own hands. 


Similarly, Yozo’s disqualification from being human is due to his own flaws. As his mind decays, so does his moral degradation consume him. We watch him inflict terrible actions on not only himself, but the people around him, particularly women. Nearly every woman who comes into contact with him has her life destroyed as a result. But if Yozo is a monster, he is a human one, despite his own fears to the contrary.  


Nearly from the day he was born, Yozo lived in perpetual guilt, shame, and fear. He despairs of ever connecting with another individual, saying “I still have no idea what it is that makes human beings tick. I have always felt as if I were suffering in hell.” He finds the very quality of being human unrelatable - when others nod at universal experiences, he panics, but hides this distress, fearing that it will alienate him even further. Even worse, he is passive by nature, a people-pleaser who can’t understand people. He is unable to deny anyone, so much so that the first time he ever refuses something given to him is later in the novel, when his wife attempts to give him more of the morphine he is addicted to. Even when he finds society oppressive, unlike other protagonists of similar novels containing messages rebelling against a meaningless society, Yozo is unable to fight back. His only mechanism of defense is to resort to clowning. 


Yozo tries to conceal his nature by making the people around him laugh. In an attempt to deflect attention from his fear that his differences will not be tolerated, Yozo masks his inability to understand others with comedy. His lack of confidence in his ability to behave like a human being results in him performing like one. He says, “As long as I can make them laugh…it’ll be alright. The one thing I must avoid is becoming offensive in their eyes: I shall be nothing, the wind, the sky.” And yet, this only leads to another fear - that he will be revealed for what he is, nothing but a fraud. 


Yozo mistrusts all other humans because he believes everyone else is dishonest. He projects his own insecurities onto them. However, his lack of humanity does not exempt him from this - his clowning, in fact, leads him directly to assume these falsehoods. He’s just as awful as the people around him: hypocritical, selfish, and cruel. But unlike the rest of Japanese society, Yozo is unable to lie about his flaws. Just as Dazai’s shishōsetsu writing style created novels that were intensely critical of himself, Yozo continuously points out his own sins, more than any anyone else. That inability to recognize that his flaws, far from disqualifying him from humanity, actually made him human, led him down a path of self destruction. 


Yozo was not a good person by any means - he confesses his vices himself very well. The way other people hide their shames, he hides his graces, but bears his failures stone faced, described in excruciating detail. Perhaps No Longer Human is so beloved because of his raw, aching honesty. It’s difficult to turn away from someone who makes no efforts to cover up their own faults, who presents the very worst of themselves and asks nothing else. 


Although Yozo was unable to ever speak a good word about himself, the final scene of the novel closes on a woman who took care of Yozo, and perhaps knew him best, confessing that he “was a good boy, an angel.” In not recognizing the humanity within him, Yozo is tortured by his isolation from the rest of his society and his inability to coexist with them. On the other hand, in this very misery lies his only chance at salvation. Yozo was not only unable to see his humanity, but he was unable to accept others' perceptions of him, which were fairer and kinder to him than he ever was to himself. Whether or not these assessments of his character were accurate is inconsequential, but they are telling of one thing. 


His desperate attempt to abide by an ethical code for humans he himself cannot understand is what causes No Longer Human to transcend peers of similar statuses. While calling Yozo ‘an angel’ is perhaps too generous, the fact remains that even when tormented by internal demons he could not escape, he often behaves as righteously as is within his power, and he rarely exercises cruelty on purpose. Most of all, it is his honesty that is devastating. 


No Longer Human is groundbreaking because of how raw it feels. It’s as if you’re a priest in a confessional, and on the other side of the wood, Yozo, a poor, hapless sinner, is pouring his heart out to you, expecting no redemption, only the cruel hand of justice. Yozo’s inability to communicate ends up being No Longer Human’s greatest strength. Dazai writes with no filter. The poignancy of his novels is such that they feel a direct landline to him, hundreds of years after his death. 


Once, someone called Russian the language of suffering - Dostoevysky has probably done much to perpetuate that reputation, but to me, Japanese literature holds that title. Recently, I have been attempting to diversify my reading. When not restricted to placing American and European works on a pedestal, abundant masterpieces from various countries can be discovered. In particular, I have discovered a special fondness for Japanese novels. It is never correct to classify a genre’s literature with one characteristic, much less an entire nation, but overall, a distinct theme emerges in many works of Japanese art - loneliness. 


It may come as a surprise when Japan is so homogenous and community based, especially compared to the individualistic America, but many of my favorite Japanese authors’ center their books on characters dealing with an inescapable loneliness: Haruki Murakami, Sayaka Murata, and of course, Osamu Dazai. Their solitude speaks to a kind of internal emptiness - an isolation from all the rest of society. A singular animal, like the 52 Hz whale. 


Keiko, another protagonist of a Japanese novel, Convenience Store Woman by Sayaka Murata, faces similar struggles in her separateness from other humans, ostensibly of the same kind, but different in every regard. Yozo takes great pains to imitate other humans, believing himself inhuman for it - not realizing that this is not only normal, but a quintessential human experience, something that is explored in Convenience Store Woman. Keiko muses that “infecting each other like this is how we maintain ourselves as human is what I think,” and “my present self is formed almost completely by the people around me.” While not all of us do it as consciously as Keiko and Yozo, each of us finds ourselves inevitably as a result of our environment. Yozo’s fear is that if he has to try at being human, he is inherently not, a being that is contrary in nature, an other. However, as Keiko explains, this is human nature.  


The Thai version of No Longer Human depicts a man trapped under a glass jar is reminiscent of Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar. Across literature, this theme of isolation is prevalent, an internal struggle between man and himself, and an external struggle between man and society. It’s clear, then, that Yozo (and through him, Dazai) was never lacking in humanity, and indeed, that no one who feels the way Yozo does was ever inhuman, although Yozo is continuously unable to realize this. 


Even in the introduction, Yozo’s face as a child is described as animalistic. He impresses the terror this visage inspires upon the reader with, “It is a monkey. A grinning monkey-face. The photograph reproduces an expression so freakish, and at the same time so unclean and even nauseating, that your impulse is to say, ‘What a wizened, hideous little boy!’” 


Immediately, Dazai presents us with a distinction between beauty and ugliness, believing most people to be incapable of discerning between the two in a meaningful way. It’s a meta introduction that Dazai may not have even realized when he had written it - No Longer Human is a brutally sad read about a man who descends deeper and deeper into a hell of his own creation. What beauty could you find in such a work? 


But No Longer Human is a masterpiece of misery without ever veering into the excessive genre of grimdark. The difference is that pain has a purpose - Yozo’s psychological torture is not gratuitous pain for the sake of indulging the reader’s gluttunous appetite for violence and horror, but rather a genuine, desperate plea for help. Language is transformative. Ocean Vuong states it beautifully when he describes metaphors as a coping mechanism, a “way to talk about trauma without stating the experience outright.” It is not just metaphors, but all fiction that can have this value. In describing universal misery, but delegating it to a character, it is removed from our personal fears and pains.

Such is the value of tragedy. What can be witnessed, can be purged. It is almost sacrificial in nature. In Grief Lessons: Four Plays By Euripides, Anne Carson says, “Watching…other people lost in grief and rage is good for you - may cleanse you of your darkness. The actor, by reiterating you, sacrifices a moment of his own life in order to give you a story of yours.” What Dazai has given us is the ability to move outside of our own heads, a way to talk about things that you find unbearable. It is an artificial vulnerability, a substitute that will do until we work up our own bravery. When you grieve for a character, understand that you are also grieving for yourself, a little. 


Perhaps that was why Dazai was so drawn to shishōsetsu writing. He was attempting to exorcise his own demons through Yozo. That makes his death all the more tragic - he killed himself after No Longer Human was published, giving us no chance to witness his growth into a future where he could recover from his difficult youth. He parallels Yozo, or perhaps Yozo parallels him, having been drawn from his life. Like his infamous protagonist, Dazai committed double suicide with a woman by jumping into a river. His body was found on his birthday. 


His death has all the elements of a tragedy. But all of this pales in comparison to what is most painful: he was a real human, and he died without ever getting to live past his traumas. As much as I love No Longer Human, I can’t help but see where it fails. I don’t believe that every book needs a happy ending - after all, my favorite genre is tragedy - but No Longer Human feels incomplete. That’s probably because it is - although Dazai finished the novel, as it’s widely considered semi autobiographical and he died shortly afterwards, to me, there’s more to the story. 


I like to believe that if he had lived to see his future, perhaps Yozo would have also been spared in the ending of No Longer Human. Yet, perhaps Yozo has already been saved. Many perceive No Longer Human’s ending as a morbid one. Yozo ends up in a sanatorium, and in his final direct sentence to us as readers, he muses that he no longer feels happiness or unhappiness, but simply that time passes. All the misery he has suffered has led him to nihilism. Of course, that view only applies if you believe that the book ends when the words do. 


No Longer Human was a slow read for me - not in the literal sense, as I burned through the pages in the matter of hours, but as in the novel haunted me. Months after I had returned it to the library, Dazai’s writing marinated in my mind. Although I could not tell why, I found myself constantly returning to the book. While I did find the themes of isolation fascinating, and could’ve spent hours poring over the meaning hidden behind metaphors, what ended up occupying my thoughts most often were those brief moments of tenderness that were sprinkled throughout, as rare as diamonds, and just as able to afford clarity. 


The moments when Yozo was able to connect with others, even if only for a moment before he spiraled again, or whenever the haze lifted and someone showed him kindness without expectation, or he was good to someone else, I remembered clearer than his alcoholism or misery. Of another of Dazai’s works, The Setting Sun, Richard Gilman says in the Jubilee, “Such is the power of art to transfigure what is objectively ignorable or depraved…to know the nature of despair and triumph over it in the ways that are possible to oneself - imagination was Dazai’s only weapon - is surely a sort of grace.” 


In the Poetics, Aristotle speaks about the concept of the macabre: how objects that initially terrify us can be transformed by art into something that touches our sensibilities of beauty. Similarly, in describing his dark fate, Dazai may yet help us escape our own. Dazai’s brilliance and tragedy, rather than detracting from each other, operate like diamonds who can only polish each other. In confessing his loneliness, Yozo mitigates ours. Even the most extroverted people will inevitably feel insecure in their relationships at some point, but as No Longer Human, and countless other books prove - your fear of isolation is proof that you are not alone. Everyone is yearning for the same thing you are. If you fear that you, alone, are unrelatable, it is a fear that is shared by millions. No Longer Human tells us what Yozo was unable to internalize - the act of existing is to be human. There is no way to avoid it - just by breathing, you are not only human, but you are excelling at it. 


Benjamin Cavallaro, Period 6, 03/25/24

  Benjamin Cavallaro, Period 6, 3/25/24 Modern Mythology 2024 Blog #3      Something that’s stuck with me since the start of the school year...