Monday, December 4, 2023

Milana Kravets, Period 6, 11/28/23

 Milana Kravets

PD#6

Modern Mythology Blog 2024

Literacy and Learning


During our exploration of transformation in lesson #25, our “Write now” prompt was to write about a way we have transformed. Originally, I approached this question by thinking about my life as a whole. I recollected significant events that have affected me, such as my transition from middle school to high school. However, looking back, I realized a transformation does not have to be something very intricate or grand, it could simply originate from occurrences in life that seemed trivial or inconsequential at first. As we wrap up the Greek Mythology Unit, I believe my experiences with it, in addition to the reading of Stone Blind, have remarkably transformed me, in a way I never thought it could. This transformation only took around two months, yet will have lifelong implications. 

Throughout this unit, we analyzed the stories of Greek Mythology. I realized my hindsight of what defines a monster was essentially inaccurate. Growing up, I used to think that a monster was simply an evil person or a frightening creature, based on its appearance. With lesson #20, I was able to expand on my outlook by learning about the criteria of figurative monsters. Fundamentally, a monster was categorized by its incompleteness, formlessness, magnification, uncanniness, categorical interstitiality, and categorical contradictoriness. With this idea in mind, my class identified Medusa under the categorical interstitiality classification, since she has snakes for hair. On the other hand, the account of Stone Blind and the interview of Natalie Haynes led me to shift my perspective beyond the conventional narrative of Medusa. Even though she was embellished with gigantic snakes on her head, giving the impression that she was a monster, she was not a monster at heart. 

As a child, the many tales I read about Medusa always depicted her as a villain, since she was a gorgon with the ability to turn people into stone with just her glance. However, I learned that she was, in fact, a victim, not a monster. She was sexually assaulted by Poseidon in Athena’s temple, which was neglected in many versions of Greek Mythology. Furthermore, the punishment she received for this, ultimately illustrates the gender inequality in Ancient Greek culture. My belief that she was a monstrous figure transformed. During this unit, I was also astonished to learn that even though she had the power to turn people to stone, she never used it maliciously. She killed no one. 

Natalie Haynes’s interview helped me further empathize with Medusa. Her modern interpretation of Medusa’s story emphasized the injustice and trauma Medusa had really suffered from. Haynes had also specifically stated how Medusa should not be viewed as a monster, but instead as a sister and daughter. Not only was she a victim of rape, but she also endured a tragic ending. She was beheaded in her sleep by Perseus. Medusa’s sexual assault drives a parallel to today’s world, where many people are still not held accountable for their actions. Fortunately, over the years, active campaigns to reduce the incidences of assault have raised consciousness of gender-based concerns throughout the world. For instance, with the #MeToo movement, people are finally speaking up about their experiences with sexual assault and breaking their silence. As a female myself, I advocate for these topics to continue to be discussed, fostering awareness and taking a step toward proper change. 

Going into this Greek Mythology unit, I never imagined how it could connect to me personally and with the current world around me, too. I have learned that even though the stories of Medusa in Greek Mythology have always been viewed in one negative way, Stone Blind has shown that differing interpretations can be made, in which there is not just one correct depiction. This newfound understanding can extend beyond mythology, in which I can approach future situations and problems with an open mindset and comprehension of the possibility of multiple interpretations.



Jasmine Mei, Period 6, 12/01/23

 Jasmine Mei 
Modern Mythology 2024 
Period 6 
Socio-political Consciousness 

    The Israel-Palestine situation that’s taken over the world in recent weeks has been an event that I find myself thinking about daily. When I first started seeing media coverage about the war, I didn’t know whose side I was meant to support. I was embarrassed to ask people around me about it because I felt as though this was something I was meant to be knowledgeable about if I had paid enough attention to the news. I would try to research articles from reputable sources and read up on those, but each article would just leave me with even more confusion. I decided to muster up the courage to ask one of my friends, Max, who I assumed would know about the war and could explain it to me. Max is a Jewish-American and said himself that he was biased because he has family back in Israel and feels he has an obligation to both his religion and his people to side with Israel. Unlike others who side with Israel, Max tried to educate me from an unbiased perspective, not trying to sway to either side but simply gave me the facts of the ordeal and let me decide for myself what I stood for. After the conversation with Max, I still didn’t stand with one particular side. I saw the arguments and points of both Israel and Palestine. I understood that the Israelis wanted land to call their own, especially after the Jewish community’s history with exile and the Holocaust. However, I also didn’t see why innocent Palestinian lives had to be sacrificed. Hospitals, filled with women and children in critical conditions, were bombed. Though I was able to recognize each side’s standpoint, I couldn’t back up a state which is actively harming and endangering millions of innocent people.

    Standing with the Free Palestine movement, I tried to play my part and do what I could to raise awareness for the Palestinian people. Posting my own take on the issue and reposting posts of journalists on the other side, I noticed that I was losing followers with each post. I was upset, not at the fact that people were unfollowing me, but that there were people who were so close minded as to only listen to one side of the problem. A common factor that I’ve seen from people who side with Israel is the argument that supporting Palestine also means supporting the Holocaust and hating the Jewish community. I think that once people break away from that mindset and see that those two views have no correlation, they’re one step closer to seeing the larger picture. I believe that a majority of the people who condemn the actions of the Israeli government only show support for Israel because they’re Jewish and feel an obligation towards their people and ancestors - if they were to show support for anyone other than Israel, it would be like they’re turning their backs on their own people. There’s a possibility that I’m wrong and that’s not one of the cases at all. Deep down, I know that this is something I’m coming up with because I want there to be a justification to people trying to condemn a genocide. It’s hard for me to imagine that there are people who genuinely support the killing of innocent people. People are associating the Palestinian people with the terrorist group, Hamas, even though Hamas is its own organization entirely and has no connection to the Palestinian people. It’s ironic then, because looking at the actions of Israel, I would argue that they are the ones terrorizing Palestine. The continuous terror reigned on the state of Palestine can be seen as ethnic cleansing - since Israel can’t justly obtain their single Jewish state (due to the majority of Palestinians vs Jews), they’re taking it forcefully by getting rid of the majority population. 

    The most horrific thing that I’ve learned of late is that Palestine had to end their school year because there were no more children to attend school; they were all killed. Everything that I’ve learned about Israel v. Palestine has been heartbreaking but this really opened my eyes to the severity of the situation. I tried to imagine myself in that situation, if everyone I knew, including myself, could no longer go to school because we were all dead. To be frank, I tried to reword that last statement because it sounded too harsh and blunt, but in this case, maybe that’s what we need to see the bare truth. Additionally, I’ve come to think of the duality of the world; how there could be first graders in America enjoying their lunch and not having to worry about the deafening sound of bombs and then halfway across the world, there are children of the same age who have to worry about survival and the safety of their family. This has made me appreciate the life that I have and realize that the problems I often complain about are, in fact, first world problems. This short blog of mine just barely covers the surface of the issue; the war is much more complex than I’ve led on but I hope that this was informative and raises awareness to those who come across it. 

Angela Dong, Period 7, 12/4/23

Modern Mythology 2024

Angela Dong
Period 7
12/4/2023

Socio-Political Consciousness

    A month ago, a big controversy came onto the internet, resulting in debates about the values of privacy, to what counts as actual content, to what extent could a big Youtuber be protected even if they did everything wrong, and how big companies can do anything they want. For some background context, here enters SSSniperwolf (real name Alia Shelesh): a Youtuber who makes a living now by ‘reacting’ to other people’s content. She is famous for her gaming videos, which was exposed that she didn’t even do, and her content videos, which I will dive into later. Most of her fans are young and don’t know anything yet, or simps (men who like women usually because of their looks). She has been embroiled in many different controversies over the past few years.

    While Alia’s gaming videos turned out to be a huge joke, there was an even huger punchline with her ‘reaction’ videos. When she saw that reacting to other people’s videos gave her a lot of views (plus money) and that she could just do nothing, make a couple of gasps and repeat what the video said, her video formats instantly changed. Every video now that she makes is just her reacting to other people’s video while doing virtually nothing. To be fair, she is not the first who has done this, but she is the biggest, and she is the one who has disregarded all her allegations while pretending that she is an angel. The videos that she reacts to, she cuts off anything regarding their original creator and doesn’t give any credit to them, not even if the original creator reaches out to her. I have no respect for anyone who is famous mostly because of their looks. Then here comes Jacksfilm: a Youtuber known for parody and comedy videos, but is also widely known for his dislike of content creators who ‘react’ to other videos. He has criticized Alia and other content creators like xqc for their lazy videos and livestreams, and often encouraged original creators to copyright strike these big content creator’s videos, while also informing people on the internet about these people.

    Alia got fed up with Jack’s attempt to inform the original owners of her ‘reacting’  to their videos, which then got copyright striked, causing her to lose money. But instead of being an 31 year old adult and talking things out with Jack, or, you know, actually doing enough commentary and crediting the original creators, she decided it was a great idea to physically go to Jack’s house, order food to lure him out, and posted his house on instagram for everyone to see with a caption saying that she just wanted to talk. Jack, who was livestreaming at the time, was horrified, which is justifiable since he just got doxxed and his location was spread to millions of people. When word of this was spread, everyone was waiting for Alia’s downfall. Maybe Youtubers have been banned and demonetized (not getting money) for less, like swearing, accidentally showing something not safe for kids, etc so everyone was waiting to see what Youtube would do about this situation. I thought that Youtube would just only demonetize her and make her change her ways, since they just had a show of strength by banning other youtubers who I believed had less reasons to be banned than Alia. Boy was I wrong. Youtube just demonetized some of Alia’s videos and did virtually nothing about the whole fiasco. Alia just got a slap on the wrist, just got told to let it blow over, wrote a shitty apology on chatGPT, and that was it.

    Maybe I had a bit too many expectations towards Youtube. I had no reason to believe that they would act in the interest of us normal people on the internet. Maybe all the time that I spent scrolling youtube had made me unconsciously think that Youtube was a great app and company that did no wrong, despite all the different things that they did, like removing the dislike button, adding five ads in an 8 minute video. All the benefits that Youtube allowed me and internet culture only seeing different trending every day led me to forget about all the atrocities that every company and every person did because they weren’t punished as they should, allowing them to stay the way they have been. An influencer could do anything they want to do, and if they make enough money then everything can blow over for them once they wait for enough time, even ruining an entire family or a man’s life. There will always be fans to support them and their bad actions (notable people include Ted Bundy’s fangirls), blowing away their past because they are beautiful/handsome. In the end, regular people get screwed over whenever they try to criticize or do something for the community. Maybe I’m more biased on Jack’s side in this case because I despise doxxing, grown adults acting like kids, and companies and famous people screwing the regular folks, but I feel like I’m on the perfectly right side of this case. But maybe I’m wrong, and I just don’t have all the information given to us. However, following all of this when it was starting, I feel like my perception of big corporations and influencers have taken a huge hit. Companies and famous people won't and shouldn’t matter that much. And we people should stand up for ourselves when these people decide they will only stand for themselves.

Sam Li, Period 7, 12/8/23

Thomas Li                                                 

Period 7, 12/08/23                                        

Modern Mythology 2024

Socio-political Consciousness
God-like

    With most deaths (except Hitler and a few others), most would expect mourning and general respect towards the deceased. Death is a dark subject expected in everyone's lives. The passing away of an individual is a moment to mourn and honor the lives that they have led. Very recently, Former United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger passed away at 100. He was a very influential government member and had been the secretary of state and national security advisor for two presidents. Even after those, he had been influential in US foreign affairs. You would expect respect for the loss of such a leader, yet, the mostly negative reaction was seen towards his passing. The internet and media had cheered for his death, while many high-level authorities and governments had paid respects. This polarizing difference of opinions was shocking to me, how could someone with such a high level of influence be hated enough to be mocked and disrespected this much on his death?

    After further research, I understood that he had influence and was responsible for the deaths of many Latin Americans through his effect in his effort to topple the Chilean regime during the Cold War. Kissinger had allowed many human rights abuses to take place, just to stop a socialist government from rising and taking power. All of this action was excused with the idea of “Realpolitik”, focusing on the best action, not accounting for morals or personal beliefs in his actions. This left a bad distaste in the mouths of the working class and the entirety of Latin America. Despite the immoral actions taking place, it could be argued that Kissinger was successful in his work and did well, which reveals something I had noticed about the correlation between success in U.S. politics and human morals.

    The mindsets of the ruling class and working class are extremely different. There is this general archetype that the rich only care about money and swaying control to be theirs, following their own beliefs without consideration for the people under them. On the other hand, the average worker prioritizes fairness and gives equal control and consideration to everyone, especially the needy. This archetype can be seen in many of the readings and stories we had read in class. The pattern of a god or ruler that had taken immoral actions and unreasonable decisions for their benefit. I feel like this pattern is being portrayed in Kissinger’s scenario. With his decisions that had ignored war crimes, he took on the role of a ruler who had been unable to relate to his commoners, not able to experience the pain of the sufferers. As a person who isn’t a political figure or government official, I was raised with morals that were more in line with the working class. I could never be able to take such heavy guilt or commit such immoral actions as some political figures did.  Morals are an important part of a human’s identity, but removing them can build equal parts good and bad for that person. Being able to separate morals could allow for better decision-making and more objectively beneficial results, but could lose the moral and emotional compassion that most people have and want.

    Another current event that I would like to point out would be the current Israel-Hamas war. The House of Representatives had recently approved a $14.5 billion bill for military aid for Israel. From the perspective of the common folk, this seemed immoral. Of course, this was to benefit the rich. Military technology companies like Lockheed Martin had impressive gains in their stock prices($400 to $436 at closing from October 6 to October 9th for ticker $LMT). This indicated a level of greed and monetary reason for passing such a large and costly bill. The true intentions of this bill seemed to be focused on economics rather than moral alignment with Israel. There is a lack of morals or care for the actual people in war.

    With the death of Henry Kissinger and the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, the morality of actions and objective vs subjective values are being played around like toys. Like a crazy Greek god and their absurd curses thrown at the people on Earth, things are done just for the benefit of the people in power. Regardless of what outcry and war crimes are committed, ignorance was considered bliss for them.


Works Cited
Ackerman, Spencer. “Henry Kissinger, War Criminal, Dead at 100.” Rolling Stone, 30 November 2023, https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/henry-kissinger-war-criminal-dead-1234804748/. Accessed 3 December 2023.
“Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Stock Price, News, Quote & History.” Yahoo Finance, https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/LMT/. Accessed 3 December 2023.
MASCARO, LISA. “House approves nearly $14.5 billion in military aid for Israel. Biden vows to veto the GOP approach.” AP News, 2 November 2023, https://apnews.com/article/house-israel-aid-ukraine-republicans-biden-gaza-b7bfe528b12ac5954cfd5c034f11320d. Accessed 3 December 2023.
POLITI, DANIEL, and PATRICIA LUNA. “Kissinger's unwavering support for brutal regimes still haunts Latin America.” AP News, 3 December 2023, https://apnews.com/article/kissinger-legacy-latin-america-chile-argentina-4780b50a4cc7f865b9771c1ab25a7187. Accessed 3 December 2023.

 

Sunday, December 3, 2023

Alyssa Lobatch, Period 1, 12/05/2023


Alyssa Lobatch
Period 1
02 December 2023
Modern Mythology 2024


Literacy & Learning


    A few days ago, we spent our class watching a video interview where Natalie Haynes, the author of Stone Blind, spoke on her inspirations for writing her novel. One moment that particularly struck me was when she discussed the noisiness of the Gorgons (specifically Euryale). She says that in the original Greek material, Euryale simply makes a really loud sound or a howl, but in most modern interpretations, this sound is translated as something negative, for instance, “a baleful dirge”. She goes on to add that a hero called Diomedes also makes a very loud noise, but his is translated as a powerful war cry. Haynes compares the two and concludes that when a woman is noisy, it’s negative, but the opposite is true for a man.

    This got me thinking about the preservation of language and stories. It’s easy to forget that almost every text we read in our lifetimes is biased in some capacity, even when it claims to be the pure truth. Translations are absolutely not exempt from this. Many of the translations of ancient myths that are accessible to us now may have been produced decades or even centuries ago, often in a time before the rise of feminism. This would explain Haynes’s example, which suggests that traditional gender roles were at play when these texts were translated. Whoever rewrote the Greek words in English applied some meaning to each word.

    Because of this, we can’t take the translations as gospel, but I am grateful to have them, since they help preserve the stories told in Greek myth so long ago. For our creation project in class, my group is studying the Celtic creation myth, and we’ve found that it’s difficult to find artifacts or written primary sources about it that are authentically from the time before the Christianization of the Celtic people. Much of the Celtic tradition and religion was wiped away through loss of sources, oral tradition, and newer cultures pushing out the old. All ancient civilizations have experienced this unfortunate phenomenon, albeit some more than others.

    There has been a lot of discussion in recent years about how we can preserve minority cultures, discussion about cultural appreciation versus appropriation, gentrification, cultural genocide, and more. Lost myths and ancient traditions are the perfect example of what could happen if we don’t do our absolute best to tell everyone’s story and make sure no one is left behind. Luckily, modern technology allows us to document everything, nearly guaranteeing that today’s stories can last centuries.

    As we move on from our Greek Mythology Unit in the next few weeks, I’ll make sure I keep this in the back of my mind. I’ll express gratitude for having access to records and translations of older folklore, but I will be critical of the way in which it is presented to me, especially if I’m not reading a primary source. I will look at it through my own lens and find my own meaning in what we read.

Rebecca Lin, Period 1, 12/04/2023

Rebecca Lin
Period 1
12/04/2023
Modern Mythology 2024

Socio-political Consciousness



In recent years, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic, the United States has seen an alarming rise in anti-Asian hate crimes. Fueled by xenophobia and harmful stereotypes, individuals of Asian descent have become targets of discrimination and violence. These incidents, ranging from verbal harassment to physical assaults, raise a huge concern about the safety within the Asian American community. The impact is not only physical but also psychological, leaving many Asian Americans feeling unsafe and fearful.

As an Asian American myself, I can’t help but feel disheartened everytime I see another anti-Asian hate crime reported on the news. My family and I are all immigrants from China, and none of my parents or grandparents understand or speak English well. Seeing all these people of Asian descent being targeted and discriminated against simply because of their ethnicity makes me scared for my own family’s safety.

“What if my parents get attacked while they’re riding the subway?”

“What if they start calling my parents slurs, and my parents can’t understand any of it?”

Personally, I’ve also been picked on just because I was Asian too. In middle school, some students would stretch their eyes to “mock” me. Others would say that the fried rice my mom made me “smells a little funny”. Some classmates would even tell me to “go back to your own country”. Although I’ve gotten over those remarks that's been said towards me, it still makes me feel incredibly frustrated, as I've always considered New York City to be a diverse and inclusive place.

Reflecting on these issues and my own experiences, I find myself questioning assumptions I may have held about the world being a safe and inclusive place. It has made me more aware of existing biases, and I've been more sensitive to the possibility of discrimination based on my ethnicity. I’ve also realized the importance of empathy and solitary. It's not just about fighting for my own community's rights, but also about standing up to injustice wherever it occurs. It's upsetting to confront the reality that others may harbor prejudices, but it has strengthened my desire to challenge ignorance through knowledge and awareness. I am constantly studying and reevaluating my own ideas in order to actively contribute to the ongoing struggle for equality and justice.

Friday, December 1, 2023

Leo Lin, Period 1, 12/1/2023



Leo Lin

Period 1

12/1/2023


In class, we’ve been reading Stone Blind for our Greek Mythology unit. This book is a retelling of Medusa’s story from a different perspective. In actual Greek mythology, Medusa was barely mentioned, yet at the same time, we can get this whole story about Perseus slaying Medusa. But is what we know about this myth accurate? I think that’s one of the questions Natalie Haynes was trying to answer. Recently in class, we were shown an interview with Natalie Haynes where she described the process she went through writing “Stone Blind”. She found out that there’s some sort of duality in Gorgons. On one hand, they are symbols of fear of the natural world, but at the same time, these gorgons were used as symbols of protection in temples. So how does the duality of the Gorgons apply to Medusa?


Since I was a kid, I’ve known Medusa as a monster. She was a hideous being terrorizing mankind. One glance from her could turn you into stone, she had poisonous blood, snakes for hair, and the tusks of a wild boar. She was a mixture of everything that could pose a threat to humans. So when Perseus killed her, I thought of him as a hero, standing up to a “stronger” being. However, after reading Stone Blind my perspective changed. Medusa was portrayed as a victim: she was sexually assaulted and then turned into a monster as punishment for not being able to stand up to Poseidon. She was considering living life in darkness to not turn her sisters into stone.


On the other hand, Perseus was depicted as a whiny brat. Despite being “overgeared” with a helmet that turned him invisible, a sword with a maxed-out attack stat, an overpowered shield, and sandals that allowed him to fly, he was still scared about killing Medusa in her sleep. He seemed like a spoiled brat, nowhere near as glorious as I used to perceive him. Natalie Haynes also mentioned that Medusa has never intentionally killed someone or abused her power. It was Perseus who abused her power. The duality of Perseus kind of reminded me of Oppenheimer, as the father of the atomic bomb, some might think of him as a hero for ending the war, and some might see him less favorably


In the interview, Natalie Haynes also brought up the story of where Odysseus met Achilles in the underworld. Odysseus envied the glory Achilles had achieved but Achilles envied Odysseus for being alive. Achilles was revered as a hero at the cost of an early life. The moral here is to value your life. There’s much more to life than let’s say a test grade or getting into a prestigious university. Always look on the bright side. So don’t worry about getting rejected from Harvard, there’s always Kingsborough Community College.

Benjamin Cavallaro, Period 6, 03/25/24

  Benjamin Cavallaro, Period 6, 3/25/24 Modern Mythology 2024 Blog #3      Something that’s stuck with me since the start of the school year...